Analysis of Urodynamic Indexes in Patients with Infiltrative Cervical Cancer after Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy

نویسندگان

  • T. V. Dermenzhy
  • V. S. Svintsitsky
  • S. V. Nespryadko
  • N. F. Ligirda
  • O. E. Stakhovsky
  • O. I. Iatsyna
  • O. V. Kabanov
چکیده

Aim — to evaluate contractile function of urinary bladder in patients with infiltrative cervical cancer (CC) after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH). 90 patients with infiltrative CC were treated with NSRH (n=45), or radical hysterectomy III type (RHE III) without preservation of pelvic autonomic plexuses (n=45). While at preoperative period P1 indexes did not differ significantly between the groups, after NSRH performance, P1 values were significantly higher than P1 values in the group of patients treated with RHE III (8.29±1.1 vs 3.51±0.8 cm H2O; р<0.05). P2 indexes in patients from both groups before and after surgical treatment differed significantly and were 6.82±0.4 and 12.27±1.2 cm H2O (р<0.05) in NSRH group, and 5.44±0.6 and 10.62±1.1 cm H2O (р<0.05) in RHE III group. The P value in both patients groups before and after the surgical treatments was significantly diffe rent, and demonstrated a gradual elevation of urinary bladder pressure, especially in the patients from RHE III treated group. Urinary bladder volume at preoperative and postoperative periods in NSRH-treated group remained practically unaltered (209.78±14.2 and 216.86±14.9 ml (р>0.5) respectively), while in the patients from RHE III-treated group after surgical treatment an urinary bladder volume significantly decreased from 188.4±10.5 to 161.9±9.8 ml (р<0.05). The data of urodynamic study evidence on better preservation of urinary bladder functions in patients with infiltrative CC after NSRH than in the patients treated with RHE III.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) in preserving bladder function and its oncologic safety in the treatment of cervical cancer. METHODS From March 2003 to November 2005, 92 patients with cervical cancer stage IA2 to IIA were randomly assigned for surgical treatment with conventional radical h...

متن کامل

O-29: Fertility Sparing Treatments in Young Patients with Gynecological Cancers: A Large Iranian Experience and A Literature Review

Background: The marriage age has been increasing recently throughout the world and researches have shown an increased rate of gynecological cancers among young women. Therefore, fertility sparing in these patients is an important point and many works have been done on conservative management in young women with gynecological cancer. Materials and Methods: In this study, we report our experience...

متن کامل

Comparison of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS Radical hysterectomy (RH) for the treatment of cervical cancer frequently caused pelvic organ dysfunctions. This study aimed to compare the results of pelvic organ function and recurrence rate after Nerve sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) and RH treatment through systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Datab...

متن کامل

Cervical Cancer - Surgery

Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer less than 2 cm is associated with specific morbidity. Urinary disorders are often noticed and can depend on pelvic plexus nerve injuries. The purpose was to compare surgical and short-term outcomes, as well as urinary disorders between robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic no nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. The fir...

متن کامل

Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.

AIM To analyze pelvic dysfunctions, quality of life, and survival after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH) compared to classical radical hysterectomy (RH) for cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS All cervical cancer patients undergoing a RH or a NSRH were evaluated for pelvic dysfunctions and filled in a quality-of-life questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 56 women were included; 31 un...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016